Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

HC commutes death sentence of serial killer to life term

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 27 2016 | 8:28 PM IST
Serial killer Chandrakant Jha was today spared of the gallows by Delhi High Court which commuted death sentence to imprisonment for "remainder of his natural life" without remission, saying he must be "emphatically and adequately punished" for his "heinous" crime.
A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and R K Gauba upheld Jha's conviction in three identical cases of murder and upheld life imprisonment in one case, while commuting the capital punishment to life term awarded to him by a trial court in two other cases in February 2013.
"In light of the aforesaid factum and balancing out of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, we feel that the present case would fall in the category wherein the extreme sentence of death by capital punishment would not be justified and at the same time possibility of award of remission and release of Jha on completion of sentence of 14 years or even thereafter, would be inadequate and parlous.
"The heinous and outrageous crime, involving inhumane behaviour and torture, must be emphatically and adequately punished. This case falls in the third category, beyond application of remission," the court said.
"In light of the above, whilst not confirming the death sentence proposed by the trial court, we award punishment of life imprisonment with a direction that Jha would not be released on remission for remainder of his natural life.
"This direction would not affect the power under Articles 72 (power of President to grant pardon) and 161 (power of the governor of state to grant pardon, remission of punishment) of the Constitution. This we feel would be appropriate and the proportionate sentence in the present case," the court added.
While commuting death to life term in two cases, the court said, "there was no eye witnesses" to these incidents.

More From This Section

In one of the three cases of murder, the trial court on February 4, 2013 had awarded life term till death to Jha for decapitating his victim and dumping the body near the Tihar Jail daring the police to nab him.
Jha, a native of Madhepura in Bihar, was sentenced to life term till death in a case relating to killing of one Dilip, whose headless body was dumped near Tihar Jail in 2007.
On February 5, 2013, Jha was sentenced to death in the second case of identical crime by the same trial court, saying his offence fell under the "rarest of rare case" as the brutality committed by him showed he "cannot be reformed".
On February 6, 2013, Jha was awarded death penalty in yet
another crime of beheading and chopping the body parts of one Anil Mandal in 2006, with the trial court saying he committed the murder in an "extremely brutal, diabolical and revolting manner". This body was also dumped outside the jail.
Jha was arrested by the Delhi Police in May 25, 2007 in Mianwali Nagar here. He was earlier arrested in 1998 in a murder case but was acquitted for want of evidence.
In December 2007, a Delhi court had acquitted him in a case after the police failed to file charge sheet against him in another murder case.
After committing the murders, Jha had even dared the police by writing several letters to them to nab him, saying he would send similar "gifts" after every 15 days.
Concurring with the findings of the trial court, the high court noted in its 89-page order that "we would now like to crystallize and recapitulate our findings that Jha is the perpetrator and the culprit, who had committed the murder and had left the decapitated torso and body parts outside Tihar Jail and Tis Hazari Court Complex."
It further observed that it "accepts that there was brutality and diabolicism in the crime for the victim's head was decapitated. The motive and reason for the crime had nothing to do with the personal conduct or provocation by the victim, but as professed, was directed against the police, who were challenged.
"The language and expressions used in the letters and the manner in which the crime was committed reflects a sense of deride, conceited arrogance and illusions of glory of a person who considered himself to be above the law and who had committed the crimes, to make the police quiver and fret.
"The perpetrator projected himself and the crimes grandiosely, proclaiming that he would continue to commit murders without being identified and caught...," it added.

Also Read

First Published: Jan 27 2016 | 8:28 PM IST

Next Story