Rejecting the petition, Justice A M Muhammed Mushtaq said it was not in the domain of the court to direct the Speaker of the Assembly to conduct an inquiry.
The court also observed that "the Speaker, being the custodian of the temple of democracy, is expected to allay any allegations by interpolation documents produced before him."
A decision made by the Speaker can be varied or reviewed by the Speaker at the final stage depending upon the inquiry made on the complaint, the Court said.
The Court was referring to the allegations made by George that originals of some of the documents have been pasted with the verification.
More From This Section
"When a member of the House makes such a serious allegation, this Court believes the Speaker will inquire into (it)," the Court said on the plea filed by George, a former government chief whip, whose disqualification has been sought by KC-M.
According to the petitioner, the Speaker simply ruled that the complaint filed by Chief Whip Thomas Unniyadan could be proceeded with. He had alleged that the original complaint and a copy of it received by him were different.
The Speaker, being the custodian of democracy, should have acted fairly, he had submitted.
In his reply, counsel for Thomas Unniyadan had argued that as per Constitution's 10th Schedule Para 6, the Speaker is the final authority to take a decision and verification of copies is not mandatory.
Cracking down on George, KC(M), the third largest partner in Kerala's ruling UDF with nine MLAs, had sought his disqualification as a legislator for his alleged anti-party activities.
George had been openly flaying UDF leaders, including Chief Minister Oommen Chandy and KC-M members, following which he was removed as party Vice-Chairman and Chief Whip in April.