Dismissing the petition by the bank Managing Director and others seeking quashing of the case against them, Justice R Mala said the charges, including 'falsification' of records, require to be probed.
The case was filed on the direction from the high court on a petition by a Tirunelveli-based theatre owner, who was a customer of the bank holding 18 different accounts, including mortgage and loan accounts.
The businessman later learnt that he had paid Rs 28 lakh in excess of the amount he owed to the bank.
As his compliant to the banking ombudsman was returned citing delay, he moved the high court and obtained a direction to the police to register an FIR. The bank officials had challenged the order in the high court.
The bank argued that it had power to adjust the sum in other accounts of a customer, and that it was a civil dispute.
You’ve reached your limit of 10 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app