The high court dismissed the bail application of Sulaiman Ahmadi, who has been staying in India as a refugee for 10 years, considering the serious nature of accusation against him and that there was an apprehension that he may tamper with or win over vital witnesses.
Besides, Justice Vinod Goel looked into the severity of punishment in case of conviction, which can be up to life term, and said there was "every likelihood of the petitioner, an Afghan national, absconding or fleeing from justice".
The bail plea was opposed by the prosecutor who said as the accused was an Afghan national, there were chances of his fleeing from justice if bail was granted.
He said vital witnesses, including the accused's friends who were at the spot, were yet to be examined and one of them had seen the two accused entering into the woman's bedroom where she was sleeping alone.
Also Read
The court rejected the argument of Ahmadi's counsel that as the forensic samples of the body fluids found on the woman's clothes failed to match with that of the accused, he should be granted bail.
"It is trite that the medical evidence is a corroborative piece of evidence but where medical evidence does not support the otherwise clinching and trustworthy ocular evidence of any material witness, then the testimony of such ocular evidence shall prevail on the medical opinion and not vice versa," the judge said.
It had said that when she went to Saleem's house along with her friend, three of his friends, including Ahmadi, were present. Eventually, her friend was dropped off at JNU. The woman told police she returned to Saleem's home and they consumed alcohol.
When the victim woke up in the morning, she saw Ahmadi allegedly forcing himself on her, the police alleged, adding that she later got to know that the two men had allegedly sexually assaulted her when she was not in her senses.
An FIR for the offence of rape and common intention was lodged at the Safdarjung Enclave police station here.
Both the accused were arrested and sent to judicial custody by a trial court which has been recording evidence in the case.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content