The constituency fell vacant after the death of sitting member and then Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa on December 5 last. An earlier notification for holding the bypoll on April 12 was rescinded over alleged electoral malpractices.
First bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar gave the direction to the EC while closing the DMK's petition seeking verification of the electoral roll to weed out bogus voters in the constituency.
The bench closed the petition by DMK secretary R S Bharathi after recording the submission by EC counsel Niranjan Rajagopal that 100 per cent verification of the electoral rolls had been done during which names of 45,819 voters had been deleted.
It asked the EC to publish the information about the deletion on its website by tomorrow.
Also Read
The court said it was expected that the EC will announce the election date for the constituency at the earliest and conduct the exercise by December 31, as directed in its September 18 order, on a public interest litigation petition.
It recorded the submission of senior counsel P Wilson for the petitioner that his client was not pressing his prayer for forbearing the EC from notifying the bypoll without taking penal action against those involved in electoral malpractices, which led to the cancellation of the voting earlier.
The counsel for the EC yesterday mentioned the matter before the bench and said the commission was not in a position to declare the schedule for the by-election in view of the pendency of the two petitions.
Submitting that the EC cancelled the byelection based on a letter by the Income Tax department, naming some persons who indulged in "bribing" the voters, the petitioner sought to know why no action was taken against them.
A police complaint lodged by then Returning Officers did not name the offenders though the I-T had mentioned them, counsel for the petitioner said alleging collusion between the officers and the offenders.
Regarding the investigation into electoral malpractices, he said a petition relating to it was pending in court.
On the charges against the returning officers, the counsel contended that the petitioners had not made any representation to the EC before making the "personal allegations" in the petition.
The petitioner has also sought a compensation of Rs five lakh from the EC towards his campaign expenditure for the cancelled byelection, and urged for recovering it from persons who indulged in the malpractices.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content