Justice S Nagamuthu, who was hearing the 'Dispense with petition' filed on behalf of Shankar, claiming that he was busy with a Cabinet meeting, said if he was not able to come to court, he could have given the clarifications and sent other files and documents relating to recommendation letters written by party men, MLAs, Minister and so on.
It was not known whether the documents submitted to him were genuine and whether he was given copies of the recommendation letter, the judge said.
Commenting on the report, Justice Nagamuthu said it was not a proper report expected from a senior Level IAS officer. It did not have even proper Index. "This court wants to take a lesson to the officer on how to file a report."
More From This Section
The court said the officer should have investigated the MLAs and other partymen who had given so called recommendation letters. The Original Recommendation letters had not been filed in court.
Similarly an enquiry on phone calls from the director's office to DEO's Assistant, recommending some candidates, was incomplete and many doubts had to be clarified.
The judge directed the IAS officer to be present in Court tomorrow, failing which the Court would issue directions it deemed fit.
The case was posted for today by the Judge on Sept 22. But the official could not come today.
Petitioner K Ganesan, a hearing and speech impaired person, who was denied a job as watchman, had alleged that the job was given to others based on recommendation letters given by politicians.