Justice S Vaidyanathan, disposing of a petition filed by S Sankar Ganesh, district secretary of Hindu Munnani organisation, seeking permission to hold demonstration demanding to build a Ram temple at Ayodhya, said giving nod to such demonstrations was "wastage of public money, time and deployment of forces, which can well be avoided".
He also said the Chief Secretary, the Home Secretary and the DGP should send a circular to the police officials intimating not to grant permission on December 6, from 2016 within one month.
Once the State decided not to give permission to the petitioner the same rule is applicable to others also, standing on the same footing, the judge said.
"If the court finds that quasi judicial powers have not been equally and unbiasedly exercised, then the question of interference arises and the principle of Wednesburly (unreasonableness) would arise," the court said.
Also Read
In case the police was declining the request of the petitioner, they should record the reasons and grounds for rejection in the said order, and they should also justify the stand for the grant of permission for two other organisations.
In case the petitioner was ready to conduct the agitation on some other date, time and place, it was open to the police consider the same within their limit, the judge said.
The court did not want express any opinion on the granting of permission for PFI and INL as they were not party to the petition, the judge said.
The judge also said that there was no justification for the petitioner to use loud speakers during the demonstration.