The CPI(M) veteran had approached the court seeking CBI probe into a case registered on the basis of claims by a relative of state minister P K Kunhalikutty, that he tried to influence witnesses in the "ice cream parlour case" of Kozhikode.
Dismissing the PIL, Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and justice K Vinod Chandran observed that if the allegations are true, it required serious investigation and serious action has to be taken.
Therefore, all complaints can be made before magistrate court only.
If the investigation is to be ordered by high court, final report and materials in case diary has to be examined. This amounts to usurping the power of magistrate, the bench held.
More From This Section
Court said that as the final report is pending consideration of magistrate, any competent person can point out the lacuna in the investigation and plead for further investigation before the magistrate.
The bench clarified that this order shall not be construed as approval or assent of final report not do we foreclose fresh investigation by CBI.
The state was rocked by the alleged sex scandal in 1997, known as ice cream parlour sex case following a complaint by a Kozhikode based NGO, Anweshi that an ice cream parlour was being run as a brothel and a number of girls were being sexually exploited there by politicians and other VIPs.