A bench comprising Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath held that a single judge of the court has correctly dismissed Bharti's plea seeking contempt action against police officials.
"The petition is dismissed as it is not maintainable," the bench said.
Appearing for Bharti, senior advocate Ram Jethmalani argued that the trial court in its order dated October 27, 2014, after noticing thirteen defects in the probe conducted in the case, had directed Delhi Police to file a reply on the plea for further investigation in the case.
On December 17, 2015, a bench of a single judge of the high court had dismissed Bharti's plea seeking action against the cops, saying the act of not filing the reply by the police officers does not constitute civil contempt.
Also Read
On October 27, 2014, Bharti, a former Delhi Law Minister, had claimed bias in the probe against him and had sought further investigation into the matter.
The trial court had then sought a reply from the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) and the SHO of Malviya Nagar Police Station within a month on Bharti's plea seeking a further probe in the case.
The police, in its charge sheet, has said, "Nine African women were victims of molestation and manhandling by a mob led by the then law minister Somnath Bharti."
The police had arrayed 41 persons as prosecution witnesses in the case, including nine Ugandan women who were allegedly beaten up and molested by the mob led by Bharti on the intervening night of January 15-16, 2014.