When the PIL by one S Narayanan of Peerkangaranai here came up today, the Court directed the Member Secretary, CMDA, to hold a departmental enquiry to fix responsibility and file a report in this regard.
It also imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on it and posted the matter for further compliance on November 25.
The Court said "It appears that unless they are egged on by complaints or Judicial orders, they seem not to work. This position is unacceptable. It is not as if when the petitioner makes a complaint or this court passes an order should action be taken," it observed.
The petitioner submitted that the councilor had applied for regularization of a commercial-cum-residential building, which was rejected by the local body.
More From This Section
Subsequently, on a complaint from the petitioner, CMDA had also issued lock and seal as well as demolition notice to the councillor in 2014.
Besides, the councillor's application for planning permission was also returned by CMDA and de-occupation notice was served.
Despite repeated letters to CMDA and Corporation authorities, no action was taken, prompting the petitioner to move court.
"For compelling the petitioner and not leaving any option but for him to approach the Court for complete inaction as also wastage of Judicial time, we burden the CMDA with costs of Rs 10,000 half of it will be paid to the petitioner and the remaining half deposited with the Tamil Nadu Mediation and conciliation Centre, Madras High Court Campus, within two weeks from today, which be recovered from the delinquent officer," it said.