Kerala High Court Registrar, who conducted a probe into the charge, had found that there were 'serious lapses' on his part in not recording the statement of Saritha.
The probe was ordered following two complaints filed in the high court alleging that the magistrate had refused to record the statement of Sarita despite hearing her for about 20 minutes incamera.
Inquiry also revealed that the magistrate had made adverse remarks against the media.
High Court Vigilance has sought explanation from the Magistrate on these points within 15 days, court sources said.
More From This Section
The explanation of the magistrate will be placed before the administrative committee consisting of Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and other senior judges of high court.
Further action will be taken on the basis of decision by administrative committee.
According to the complainants, despite Sarita's plea, the magistrate had refused to record her confidential statement when she was produced in the court on July 20 and had instead asked her to make a written complaint and hand it to the superintendent of the Attakulangara jail where she is lodged.
Following the magistrate's directions, Sarita had filed a three-page complaint to the jail superintendent while there were media reports that she had earlier prepared an over 20 page report to be submitted to the magistrate which allegedly contained names of politicians.
Two other members of the Chief Minister's Office were also suspended following which the opposition Left Democratic front launched demonstrations demanding the chief minister's resignation.