A division bench comprising justices S Manikumar and M Govindaraj asked the counsel appearing for the trade unions to inform their decision to the court tomorrow, even as the strike over wage revision entered the seventh day today.
The bench posted to January 11 the further hearing of a batch of petitions relating to the "flash strike" by state transport corporation workers.
The transport workers could resume their work from today itself following the implementation, it said.
The disputes relating to 0.13 per cent further wage hike and other issues could be heard later on merits, the bench added.
Also Read
Senior Counsel Prakash and advocate Prasad, appearing for Labour Progressive Federation and CITU respectively, sought time to get instructions from the trade union leaders.
When the bench resumed its proceedings at 6 p.m, the counsel appearing for the trade unions did not agree with the proposal.
Senior counsel Prakash said the Advocate General was trying to create an impression that he will give an undertaking that the 2.44 per cent wage hike will be implemented as if the government was magnanimous when major trade unions did not participate in the negotiations.
The AG said 23 sittings were held and in all the sittings all the trade unions participated but the CITU and LPF unions did not sign and they walked out.
The AG said he can prove by records the unions which have signed the settlement, has a strength of 70 per cent of the total workers.
They were willing to ply the buses but these trade unions were preventing them, he alleged.
Senior counsel Prakash said no organisation shall function without self-respect. The workers suffered for more than one-and-a-half years.
By obtaining signatures from 34 small unions and without holding negotiations with major unions, the government claims that settlement has been arrived at, the counsel said.
Law does not say they should not strike. Strike will always cause inconvenience. It was not the intention of the workers to cause inconvenience. But for compulsion, they resorted to strike, he added.
The bench said it was clear from the union leaders, who were present in court and giving instructions to their counsel that unless the government comes forward and decide the issue, they will not withdraw the strike.
Larger public interest should be taken into account. Everybody should not be affected including workers, it said.
"We are making this suggestion in the larger interest of the public. Till Pongal festival, public should not suffer. We leave it to your conscience," the bench added.
The counsel for the trade unions said they will inform the decision on the suggestion to the court tomorrow.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content