HC order has adversely affected tourism biz at Corbett Tiger Reserve: Local traders

Image
Press Trust of India Dehradun
Last Updated : Nov 14 2018 | 7:15 PM IST

The volume of tourism business at the Corbett Tiger Reserve has come down by more than half after a high court order banned night stay at the forest rest houses and restricted movement of vehicles in the reserve area, local traders said.

"A large number of booking have been cancelled after the Uttarakhand High Court banned night stay in the forest rest houses in different zones of the reserve including Dhara, Jhirna, Dhela, Bijrani and Dhikala. This has caused substantial loss of revenue to the reserve, which is extremely popular among tourists not only from across the country but also from abroad," CTR's Director Rahul told PTI.

He said the Dhikala zone of the reserve was going to open on Thursday but the usual excitement was not there as there will be no night stay at the forest and the number of Gypsies engaged for safaris in the zone has also been severely restricted.

Local tourism traders are upset with large number of bookings being cancelled and visitors preferring to go other tiger reserves in the country, he said.

Kiran Sagar, General Manager of a resort in Sitabani which falls in the buffer zone of Corbett, said the volume of tourism related business at the reserve has recorded a fall of about 50 to 60 per cent.

After the high court ban not more than 20 gypsies can ply in the zone in a day, he said.

Huge number of bookings have been cancelled and visitors are making a beeline to Ranthambore, Kanha and Bandhavgarh tiger reserves, said Sagar, who is also an avid bird watcher.

Retired warden of Corbett Satish Chandra Upadhyay, who now runs a homestay facility in Semal Khaliya village, said the state government should file a petition in the Supreme Court seeking a review of the high court ban on night stay in forest rest houses and restriction on the number of vehicles plying on its zones.

In an order dated August 10, a division bench of the Uttarakhand High Court had said, "We are of the view that no tourist should be permitted to stay overnight in national parks, protected forests and reserve forests in order to protect wild life."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 14 2018 | 7:15 PM IST

Next Story