While rejecting the objection raised by Special Government Pleader R Rajeswaran regarding the locus standi of Ramaswamy to file the petition, Justice T S Sivagnanam in his order said, "in the instant case, the petitioner is the father-in-law of the aggrieved person. Therefore the objection rose with regard to the petitioner's locus standi to file the present writ petition stands rejected."
He claimed a total loss Rs 4,36,700 including for damages to the car and two wheeler of his son-in-law.
He contended that he had given a representation to the authorities on December 26 last year but no action was taken.
"The grievance of the petitioner is that a canal which was running in the backside of his property has been closed and authorities had laid road which has resulted in flooding. The question is as to whether the state can be held liable to compensate the petitioner's family for the loss suffered by them", the said and posted the matter for further hearing to February 12.