The First Bench Comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice R Mahadevan gave the direction on a PIL by social activist Traffic Ramaswamy.
Lambasting the police for their lethargic attitude towards the encroachers, the bench said, "how are you permitting hawking despite a notice board prohibiting hawkers? On one hand, authorities erect a board declaring certain areas as no-hawking zone, but, on the other, they permit hawkers to occupy the same platforms."
The petitioner alleged that the Police officials instead of removing the encroachers from the prohibited place, encouraged them for their personal benefits.
The high court on October 5 had modified its September 9
Also Read
order saying the aspect of non-squatting zones were not inconsistent with the 2014 Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending Act which prohibits vending activities in non-vending areas.
The court noted that though the Act came into force on May 1, 2014, "there were several lapses in proper implementation of its provisions and consequently, no vending zones have not yet been declared".
The applications filed today were moved in an earlier PIL by the Congress leader, through advocate Aman Panwar, seeking directions to the authorities not to evict street vendors till the Act was implemented and a scheme formulated for survey of the existing vendors and issuance of Certificate of Vending.