"To deny that there is a seering public interest in the prosecution of the case, would be to act like an ostrich, whose head is buried in sand," Justice Rajiv Shakdher said while allowing a representative each from national dailies and news agencies including PTI to cover the day-to-day hearing of the sensational case that had sparked national outrage.
Slamming Delhi police, the court said it had no business to issue an advisory prohibiting reportage of the proceedings.
"In my opinion, the State had no business to issue an advisory in that behalf. Therefore, the argument of Dayan Krishnan that the advisory was issued by the police only as a measure of 'courtesy' to the media, is completely untenable, keeping in mind the statutory purpose and the manner in which Courts are required to function.
More From This Section
The court said that no concrete direction, "which are cast in stone", can be issued regarding media coverage of a case of such nature.
It, however, issued certain guidelines on the plea, filed by some scribes through lawyer Meenakshi Lekhi, outlining the procedures to be adopted by media persons in reporting the proceedings in the case.
"The reporting shall not disclose the names of the victim or those of the members of the family of the victim or the complainant or witnesses cited in the proceedings. The reportage shall exclude the part of the proceedings which the trial court specifically so directs," it said.