Roshana Shashikant Gaikwad, a resident of Ulhasnagar town in adjoining Thane district, had poured kerosene on her husband and set him ablaze after he sold a shampoo bottle bought by her to purchase liquor, in 2012.
The HC said it was modifying the punishment looking into the facts and circumstances of the case and also because the crime was committed in a fit of rage by the lady who later tried to save her husband by putting off the fire.
"No doubt the evidence on record shows that it was the appellant who set her husband on fire. However, the pivotal question is what is the nature of the offence proved against the appellant?
"It is an admitted fact that the appellant had a quarrel with her husband and, thereafter, she set him on fire. However, immediately after Shashikant caught fire, the appellant tried to extinguish the fire and in the process sustained burn injuries. This conduct cannot be divorced from totality of the circumstances," a Bench of Justices V K Tahilramani and V L Achilya observed in their judgement on April 4.
"Looking at the circumstances of this case, especially the fact that the appellant is a lady, sentence of five years with a fine amount of Rs 1,000 (whose default will invite RI for one month), meets the end of justice," they said.