Instead, the High Court awarded 10 years' rigorous imprisonment to Tanaji Khude, who was found guilty of committing the criminal offence of 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder'.
"In our view, the case would fall under Section 304 Part I of IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder with intention to kill) because we are of the opinion that the appellant did not just have the knowledge that his act is likely to cause death, but he intended to cause the death of his wife Suvarna," noted judges P D Kode and V K Tahilaramani.
Defence lawyer Arfan Sait argued that the case would fall under section 304 part II IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder with intention and knowledge that the criminal act would result in death).
However, the court noted, "We are not prepared to accede to the submission of Mr Sait that the case would fall under Section 304 Part II of IPC. In our view, the case would fall under Section 304 Part I of IPC because we are of the opinion that the appellant did not just have the knowledge that his act is likely to cause death, but in fact the appellant intended to cause the death of his wife."