"Considering the fact that the applicant is a senior police officer in the state of Gujarat, the likelihood of his tampering with evidence and intimidating witnesses if released on bail, cannot be ruled out," said Justice Abhilasha Kumari while pronouncing the order reserved on September 7, 2012.
"Also considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, in my view, there exists a prima facie case against the applicant (Chudasama), as is clearly borne out from the material on record," it was observed.
"This is not a fit case to exercise the discretionary powers under Article 439 of the constitution," said Justice Abhilasha Kumari, while pronouncing the order reserved on September 7.
The court also clarified that, "The trial court shall decide the case in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observations made in this judgement, as the court has examined the matter only from the perspective of grant of bail, without entering into the merits of the case".
Earlier, just before the pronouncement of the order, CBI counsel Yogesh Ravani informed the court about Thursday's Supreme Court order, directing transfer of the trial of this case out of Gujarat state.
However, Justice Abhilasha Kumari said that she will go ahead with the pronouncement.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court had rejected the CBI's plea to cancel the bail granted to former Gujarat minister Amit Shah in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh encounter case, but agreed to transfer the trial from Gujarat to Mumbai. (MORE)