HC refuses plea to direct JJB on surrender of juveniles

Bs_logoImage
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Feb 16 2016 | 10:42 PM IST
The Madras High Court today refused to direct Juvenile Justice Board to accept the surrender of five petitioners, arrested in connection with various criminal cases, and consider their bail application on the same day that they had given themselves up.
Dismissing a batch of petitions filed on behalf of the juveniles, Justice P N Prakash said that as per the New Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of children) Act 2016, those involved in bailable or non-bailable crimes should not be released if there appeared reasonable grounds to believe that in doing so, it was likely to bring that person in association with any known criminal or expose them to moral, physical or psychological danger.
In a given case, whether a juvenile in conflict with law would be exposed to moral, physical or psychological danger was a fact that could be assessed only by JJB, where members were trained to gauge the situation, the judge said.
"This court cannot give a blanket order in all the cases to the JJB to release the juveniles," he said.
Quoting two examples, he said that in one case a juvenile had allegedly passed derogatory remarks against a woman of another community, which could cause communal violence.
In the teeth of such serious allegations, if he was released on bail on the same day, there was a possibility of outbreak of communal violence in the village.
In another case one the juvenile had stabbed a victim. Here also the JJB should have to assess if there was any danger to juvenile if he was released, the judge said.
The source of power for granting bail to a juvenile in conflict with law was not traceable to the criminal procedure code, the judge said.
"The court has no jurisdiction to give such a direction as prayed by the petitioners in matters concerning special statute like Juvenile Justice Act and directing the board to act in breach of law, however noble it may seem to appear," the judge said, dismissing the petition.

You’ve reached your limit of 10 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 16 2016 | 10:42 PM IST