A bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva simply listed the matter for further hearing on May 25 and did not heed the Centre's repeated pleas for issuing a contempt notice to Jindal.
"We have heard your arguments. Let's move on to the main matter," the bench said, adding it will decide later whether to issue contempt notice.
The Coal Ministry, represented by Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain and advocate Akshay Makhija, contended that notice be issued in the matter to Jindal as well as the employee Rajesh Sharma, who was caught recording.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the industrialist, argued that there are several hundreds of employees in Jindal's company and he cannot be expected to recognise everyone.
Also Read
"But he would recognise his General Manager (Sharma)," Jain said in response and added "let him (Jindal) say he does not recognise his GM."
The court, however, said it had examined Sharma's phone and found he had recorded nothing.
It also took on record Sharma's affidavit in which he has said he was not instructed by anyone to record the court proceedings and that he had done this on his own.