Justice Pratibha Rani, however, allowed the trio to withdraw their plea.
"Delhi Police's counsel submits that after examining the documents handed over to him by the petitioners, in case the investigation officers forms an opinion that their arrest is necessary, seven days notice would be served on them to enable them to avail the remedy as per law.
"In view of the assurance give, the counsel (for accused persons) seeks to withdraw the petitions," the court noted.
They have been booked under various sections of the IPC including theft in a dwelling house, house-trespass and for criminal conspiracy.
Also Read
As per the FIR, an advocate, is the complainant. He lives in Chandigarh with his family. While practising in Delhi, he had bought a house named Anand Niketan in 1998 after living there as a tenant for a few years. While his office was on the first floor of the house, the ground floor was given to Punjab National Bank on rent.
According to the FIR, the bank allegedly shot a notice to the complainant in January 2014.
The man, who visited his house in Delhi to carry out the work, allegedly found that his first floor office had been broken in and all his valuables were missing. He approached the police. However, the case was not registered. Following which he had moved the trial court for lodging of an FIR against bank officials.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content