Justice Mukta Gupta said once the offences are committed by a citizen of India within the country and outside, the court of the place where the offence was committed and the place where the accused was brought from abroad, both will have the territorial jurisdiction.
"When offences are allegedly committed by a citizen of India within the country and outside as well, both the courts i.E. Where the offence was allegedly committed in India and also where the accused on being brought to India is found, would have territorial jurisdiction to try the offences so committed, if the offences can be tried together," it said.
The offence was committed again when another passport, based on the renewed one, was issued by the Indian Consulate at Sydney, Australia, the high court said, adding as Rajan was brought to Delhi by CBI, the trial court here too has the jurisdiction.
"Though the special Judge at Bangalore has territorial jurisdiction to try the offences. However, the special Judge at Delhi also has territorial jurisdiction to try the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner (Lalitha Lakshmanan) and co-accused (Rajan)," the high court said.
More From This Section
The trial court here had framed charges of cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy under the IPC and under provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act against Lakshmanan.
Similar charges have also been framed against two other public servants -- Jayashree Dattatray Rahate and Deepak Natvarlal Shah -- who have also been accused of helping Rajan procure a fake passport in the name of Mohan Kumar.
The trial court had framed charges also under the Passport Act against all the accused, including the gangster.
While Rajan is lodged in Tihar Jail here, the other three accused are out on bail.