It also hoped that the government acts swiftly and appoints the advisory board as early as possible.
The bench here made the observation while dismissing a Habeas Corpus petition on the ground that the plea was infructuous, as the Theni district collector, who had ordered the detention of the petitioner's son, Prabakaran, had revoked it later for lack of advice from the Advisory Board.
The petitioner had moved the high court, challenging the detention of his son under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential commodities Act, 1980.
It noted that according to the Additional Advocate General, the process for putting in place the board had started long before, but it had not been constituted so far.
More From This Section
Earlier, a division bench of the high court in Chennai presided by the Chief Justice had remarked that "it appears that the government's desire was to set all detenus free by not appointing the board."
Despite the court's remarks, the board had not been constituted.
"This is regrettable" the court said, adding, "We hope that the government would act swiftly and appoint the advisory board as early as possible."