A bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Vipin Sanghi refused to entertain the plea of Baswa Nand, who had retired as a class II public servant after serving in the Revenue Department of Finance Ministry, and said that he has neither any "locus standi" to file the PIL nor he is "directly affected".
The petitioner had opposed the Lokpal provisions contending that they were violative of Fundamental rights.
The petition, filed through advocate Kaanan Kapoor and Bhushan Kapoor, had contended that the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act of 2013 is ultra vires as well as contrary to the provisions of the RTI Act and Income Tax Act.
It had said that online publication of the finances and other assets of spouses and children of public servants amounts to violation of right to privacy.
Also Read
It said if independent liabilities of the spouse and or the dependent children, which have no relation with the public servant, are disclosed on government website, they will "cause prejudice and humiliation before the public at large".
However, a similar plea, which has been filed by Vinita Singla, an employee with a private IT firm and wife of a public servant, is still pending decision in the high court.