The First Bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Abdul Quddhose declined to entertain a plea by Chennai residents N Janardhanan and M Muthukumar, saying it pertained to service matters.
The bench said, "Whether action should be taken against any employee or whether loss caused to an employer should be recovered from the employee are service matters in respect of which PIL cannot be entertained.
The petitioners submitted that the 8-day strike by the transport unions had not only affected the public but also the transport corporations which incurred financial loss.
Asserting that shifting of the financial burden on the public through fare hike would set a bad precedent to other government employees, the petitioners prayed for a direction to the government to take immediate steps to recover the loss from the transport employees who participated in the strike.
More From This Section
On January 19, the state government had increased the prices of tickets of buses operated by transport corporations by about 20 to 54.54 per cent, drawing criticism from various quarters.
However, the workers had withdrawn their strike on January 11 after the Madras High Court appointed an arbitrator to settle their wage-related dispute with the government.
Following protests by opposition parties and the public, especially students, over the "steep" hike, the government had on January 28 revised the bus fares marginally.