"We will consider your plea and arguments and pass an appropriate order," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw said.
The court was hearing the plea of advocate Mithilesh Kumar Pandey who has challenged the "validity of post-poll alliances among political parties" on the ground that the same is a "breach of the promises made by them during the election campaigns".
On the issue of post-poll alliances, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain said there are several national and regional parties and often such alliances have to be entered into to ensure a government is formed as it would not be feasible to conduct elections till one party has an absolute majority.
"We can't have elections at the drop of a hat," the ASG added.
More From This Section
He also said "promises in poll manifestos can only be followed to the extent it is possible", adding that in future "we may be able to have electoral reforms of this nature when our democracy is more mature".
His PIL has sought a direction "declaring unconstitutional the practice of post-poll alliances among parties which contested elections against each other".
"Issue directions preventing political parties from violating their own manifestos when such parties enter into post-poll electoral alliances in order to form a government," his petition has also stated.
It has also stated that the competent authority be directed to "take steps to make the manifesto a legally-binding document".