Justice Anu Malhotra heard the arguments of the counsel for the SIT, Sajjan Kumar and riot victims and said it would pass an order.
During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain, appearing for the SIT which is probing the charges against Kumar, argued that the trial court's order granting anticipatory bail to the leader was "perverse" and there were overwhelming circumstances which were ignored.
He argued that the trial court's bail order could not have been and ought not to have been passed, and should be set aside.
While reading out the statements of various witnesses, the ASG said the sessions judge had observed in his order that the evidence was hearsay. However, all these evidences are not hearsay and there are eye witnesses to the incident, he added.
Also Read
Opposing the plea, advocate Anil Sharma, appearing for the Congress leader, said he was neither defending the incident, nor saying that it did not take place.
He submitted that former MP's name was never taken earlier and it was a case of fresh allegations coming up after 32 years which was not allowed.
Senior advocate H S Phoolka, representing the riot victims, said the SIT was fully empowered to probe the case.
The complaint in Janakpuri pertains to the killing of two Sikhs, Sohan Singh and his son-in-law Avtar Singh, on November 1, 1984 and in the other, where another Sikh, Gurcharan Singh, was burnt on November 2, 1984 in the jurisdiction of Vikaspuri Police Station. Gurcharan, who was half burnt, had remained bed-ridden for 29 years. He died three years ago.
The SIT had been constituted by the Union Home Ministry in February 2015 to reinvestigate 'serious cases' filed in Delhi relating to riots that followed the assassination of Indira Gandhi.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content