Justice M Duraiswamy reserved the orders after hearing the arguments of the additional solicitor general (ASG) and Maran's counsel.
When the matter came up for hearing, senior counsel P S Raman, appearing for Maran, submitted that the petitioner had not received any salary from the company.
The counsel submitted that Maran was the non-executive chairman of the company and was not involved in its day-to-day affairs.
ASG G Rajagopalan, who appeared on behalf of the IT department, contended that the Madras High Court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter as the complaint was filed in Delhi.
More From This Section
The petitioner had already filed a petition, seeking quashing of the proceedings, and obtained a stay order from the Delhi High Court, the ASG submitted.
He further submitted that as per the company's own annual statements for 2012 and 2013, the petitioner was the holder of 52 per cent shares in SpiceJet.
The ASG further argued that whether Maran was a principal officer or not was a question of fact, "which has to be agitated before the criminal court. Hence, this court cannot go into it".
After the completion of the arguments, the judge reserved his orders.