Justice PN Prakash was dealing with pleas filed under Section 482 with some seeking direction to police to register a case while others demanding quashing of cases.
After hearing arguments from some senior advocates for and against the power of the court under Section 482 of the CrPc, the judge observed that "on one hand, the high court passes an order to register a case and on the other hand, the same court will quash the case which is a contradictory one."
When advocate Paul Kanagaraj submitted that the Supreme Court never prevented the high court from issuing direction to police to register a case, the judge immediately asked him to cite the case.
Former Public Prosecutor I Subramaniam, while referring to an Apex Court judgment, said the high court cannot give a direction to police to do "this and that".
Also Read
When Advocate Vijayaraghavan submitted that people have faith in the judiciary and not to close the doors of the high court while deciding its power under Section 482 of the CrPc, the judge orally observed "people come with oblique motive, and genuine litigants are unable to get justice".
After hearing the arguments, the judge reserved orders.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content