Justice Manmohan concluded hearing arguments on the plea and directed the firm and the Centre to file short submissions on the issue relating to the export-import policy of the country.
"Arguments heard. Judgement reserved," the court said.
During the arguments, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, said that Cairn India cannot be permitted to export crude as "no unrefined petroleum product is allowed to be exported".
"It is not the policy of the government of the day but it is the policy of the country since decades," he said.
More From This Section
The counsel, appearing for Cairn India, countered the ASG's submissions and said that the export policy gives it the right to export.
"There is no policy which does not permit export of crude," the counsel said, adding that it right to export was "arbitrarily" curtailed.
The government had earlier argued that export of the country's domestic crude oil cannot be allowed as it would be detrimental to national interest considering the fact that nearly 85 per cent of required crude was imported.
Cairn India's counsel had said that they are ready to sell crude within India provided they get the benchmark price.
Under the contract, the government or its nominee can pick up the company's share of crude and what is not picked up, could be sold to private players or exported, Cairn has said.
It has claimed that as a result of selling excess crude to private domestic companies like Reliance and Essar, at rates lower than international prices, the government was losing about Rs 4.5 crore per day.
Cairn had claimed that it had made several representations to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade for permission to export the crude, but did not get any response.
Prior to this, it had written to Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) to "canalise" export of the crude, but got no response from it as well. IOCL is the canalising agent for the export of crude.