Justice Indermeet Kaur directed the bank to indicate its stand on affidavit, regarding the bidder's petition seeking refund of the money deposited by him.
66-year-old Haryana resident, Krishan Chander Gulia, has submitted in his plea that he took part in the e-auction of the property at Gurugram in Haryana on June 14 this year and was declared the highest bidder.
Advocate Pankaj Gupta, representing the petitioner, told the court that his client had written to the bank to allow him inspect the documents of the property but the request was not granted.
"The illegal forfeiture of his Rs 23.85 lakh, the earnest money, is liable to be set aside," the counsel said, adding that this was 10 per cent of the total bid amount of over Rs 2.3 crore.
More From This Section
Advocate Kush Sharma, appearing for the bank, opposed the petition and said it was "not maintainable" and that Gulia was allowed to inspect the records of the property.
Sharma said he will take instruction on this aspect and produce the record relating to this case on the next date of hearing on September 12.
The bank informed the court that there was an instruction from the buyer to stop payment on the 25 per cent amount which had to be deposited against the auction bid.
"Only 10 per cent of the amount has been deposited which was the earnest money. For the balance, there was instruction to the bank to stop payment," the bank's lawyer said.