This was stated by senior counsel M S Karnik who appeared on behalf of the Registrar of the High Court on a PIL alleging lack of police escort to produce prisoners before the Courts.
A bench headed by Justice Naresh Patil wanted to know how many video conference facilities were operational and accordingly asked the lawyer to file an affidavit within a week giving this information.
On behalf of jail authorities, the state government has been asked to file an affidavit while on behalf of the registrar of the High Court, lawyer Karnik has been asked to give such data.
Earlier, the prison authorities had suggested the use of Video Conference facility for production of accused for extension of their judicial custody. Following this, the court had directed the authorities to set up such convenience.
More From This Section
The petitioner, today, argued that some of the video conference equipment installed were not operational and sought a direction to the authorities to inform the state of such facilities in jails and courts.
On a High Court directive, the Maharashtra Government had sought help of National Information Centre to upgrade the existing video conference facilities in the courts and jails.
The State had initially submitted a plan of action formulated by it to address the issue of under-utilisation of video conferencing facilities in prisons and courts. This was followed by a high-level meeting between government officers, judicial officers, prison authorities and bureaucrats.