Justice B Rajendran granted the stay on a writ petition filed by the Coimbatore Jewellery Manufacturers Association, which challenged the new policy of the BIS, holding jewellery traders and outlets responsible for the purity of hallmarked gold ornaments.
A L Somayaji, senior counsel appearing for the association, said traders could not be held accountable for the purity and quality of the jewellery they sell and the responsibility vested with manufacturers and hallmarking centres to ensure the purity.
Besides asking them to redress complaints of substandard quality of gold, BIS said guilty jewelers must pay compensation to the buyer.
Assailing this clause and blaming manufacturers and hallmarking centres for impure gold jewellery masquerading as pure 916-grade gold, Association's President B Muthuvenkatram said, "Even jewellery having purity content of 78 per cent or 85 per cent are simply hallmarked as 916 in the jewellery and sometimes even 1 gm gold jewellery is also hallmarked as 916. There is no guarantee that all the jewellery which is sent for hallmarking contains same purity."
Also Read
"Hallmarking centres are doing unhealthy practice by not adhering to the BIS rules and regulations, and are hallmarking the jewellery for Rs 8 to Rs 10 per piece," it said.
Calling for fool-proof hallmarking procedures to save innocent jewelers and consumers, petitioner said, "Nowadays, a lot of iridium and osmium metals are mixed in jewellery manufacturing. Most of the jewellers are not aware of this, and they are dependent upon only hallmarking centres to help them out. When hallmarking centres do not conduct proper test, there is no safety for the jewelers."
"Jewellers, who are merely traders, cannot be held responsible for any defect or adulteration, especially when jewelleries were given hallmark by BIS-licensed hallmark agents after verifying the quality and weight of the gold," the petition said.