"No coercive steps against the petitioner (be taken), including his arrest," Justice Mukta Gupta said, noting that the relief is being granted subject to the petitioner joining the investigation in the case.
The court also issued notice to Delhi police and sought its response on the plea by accused Swami Santosh Anand, who sought anticipatorty bail and protection from arrest.
The next date of hearing the case is May 9.
It had also rejected Swami Om's anticipatory bail plea on the ground that the allegations were grave and he could hamper the investigation.
More From This Section
During hearing before the trial court, the investigating officer had said that the woman had recorded her statement before a magistrate in which she fully supported the allegations made in the FIR.
As per the FIR lodged at the IP Estate police station here, the woman was allegedly wrongfully restrained by Swami Om and Anand when she was going home. They hurled abuses at her and committed objectionable acts, it has alleged.
They also threatened her that they will not spare her and that they had already ruined her husband's life, it has said.
The counsel, who represented Anand, had sought bail on the ground that he has been falsely implicated as a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act was lodged against the woman's husband at his behest.
The FIR was just a "counterblast", the counsel had said.
The woman had alleged that Swami Om and his associate had ripped off her clothes on February 7.
No arrest has been made in the case.