Expressing serious concern over non-initiation of criminal action against police personnel who took bribe, the Madras High Court on Thursday directed the authorities to slap cases under anti-graft law to rein them in.
Rejecting the plea of a police inspector M Ramaswamy, who wanted a minor punishment of "censure" against him for taking bribe to be quashed, Justice S M Subramaniam slammed the insensitiveness of higher officials towards demand and acceptance of bribe.
The inspector had allegedly taken bribe, known as "mamool" in local parlance, and the charge was proven. Mamool also meant that it was periodical.
The disciplinary authority imposed a punishment of reduction in time scale of pay by one stage for one year. It would have a bearing on future increment also for a year, as per the punishment.
When the inspector appealed to the Additional Director General of Police (Law and order), the punishment was reduced to censure.
The petitioner later approached the court seeking quashing of censure since it affected his promotion to the rank of deputy police superintendent.
Citing the course the proceedings had taken in the police department, the judge said it was evident that the competent appellate authority had shown "absolute insensitiveness" towards the grave offence of acceptance of bribe and it was "not acceptable."