The public interest litigation was mentioned before a bench of justices B D Ahmed and Siddharth Mridul by a civil services aspirant whose earlier individual plea on the same issue was dismissed yesterday by a single judge bench.
The single judge bench had refused to hear the plea saying it was not "maintainable". The court, however, had granted the liberty for filing a PIL on the issue.
The court said, "It seems you (lawyer) are fond of running from one court to another. You should have mentioned this before the single judge bench itself and the same petition would have been referred to a larger bench as a PIL."
Recently, the Centre had, following protests by a section of students over English Comprehension test in the Preliminary Examination of the Civil Services examination, decided to remove the questions of English languages in the CSAT.
Also Read
Dinesh Bhatia, a woman civil services aspirant, had moved the petition against the August 16 notice of UPSC that had said that questions under English Comprehension test category will not be checked.
UPSC had, in its notification, said "the Paper-II would contain a section on English Language Comprehension Skills (Class X Level). Candidates must note that they do not have to answer the questions on this English Language Comprehension Skills (Class X Level) section. These questions will not be evaluated."