Justice Manmohan, who had reserved the verdict on August 10, would pronounce the judgement in the matter in which the firm had argued that the export policy gave it the right to export.
During arguments, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, had opposed Cairn India's plea saying it cannot be permitted to export crude as "no unrefined petroleum product is allowed to be exported".
The government had said that export of country's domestic crude oil cannot be allowed as it would be detrimental to national interest considering the fact that nearly 85 per cent of required crude was imported.
Cairn India's counsel had said they were ready to sell crude within India provided they got the benchmark price.
Also Read
Cairn has a production-sharing contract with government under which the company gets 70 per cent of crude produced from Barmer, with the rest going to the government.
However, after the crude is sold, the government gets 70 per cent of the profits, the company has contended.
It had claimed that as a result of selling excess crude to private domestic companies like Reliance and Essar, at rates lower than international prices, the government was losing about Rs 4.5 crore per day.
Cairn had claimed it had made several representations to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade for permission to export the crude, but did not get any response.
Canalising agents are those through which a product can be imported or exported by companies which do not have permission to do so directly.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content