"Now, there is a direction of this court (single judge), passed under ... (an article of) the Constitution of India, you follow that," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra said, asking why it has not complied with the order.
The court's observation came during the hearing of an appeal by Siddharth International Public School challenging the single judge's August 26 order, which had asked it to admit the boy on the grond that he was legally entitled to a seat in the institution.
The school had contended before the single judge that MACT lacked jurisdiction to pass such an order which was issued on a plea by the child's mother.
Agreeing with the school on this point, the single judge had set aside the tribunal's direction, but adopted the order and directed the institute to admit the boy.
The division bench reserved its judgement on the plea, saying it will consider all the aspects raised in the writ petition and pass the order.
The single judge had made it clear that the directions in the present case were passed "to rehabilitate an accident victim who also belongs to an EWS/DG category. There is nothing to suggest that in present case, justice and law cannot dwell together. After all, one should not forget that the purpose of all law is justice".