"His conduct is so deplorable that even now he wishes to destroy the remaining life of the respondent (ex-wife) who is now leading a happily married life with her husband.
"The objection raised by him about the alleged illegality of the other marriage that the respondent entered into despite an appeal period available to him is without any force in view of the admission made by him in the amicable settlement," Justice Manmohan Singh said while dismissing his plea.
It condoned the "omission" of the woman to re-marry before the period of appeal, available to her first husband, expired.
"As a matter of fact, on the date of execution of amicable settlement, the marriage had become annulled and mere formalities had remained to obtain a decree on the basis of the said settlement.
Also Read
"In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice of saving the second marriage of the respondent, this court is inclined to condone the omission committed by the respondent...," it said.
"This court is of the considered view that once he has made admission of his guilt in the amicable settlement and has also taken benefit of the same in criminal proceedings, all his subsequent protests is an afterthought," it said.
The couple's marriage was annulled by an amicable settlement after the woman had lodged an FIR alleging that she was not in her senses when they had got married as she had been drugged by the man and his sister.