Dismissing his anticipatory bail plea, Justice Kemal Pesha said that in a 'serious matter' like this involving a serious offence, the petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail.
Justice Pasha observed that it was a 'serious matter' to be dealt with severely by police and a thorough investigation has to be carried out.
"It is a pity that police has taken a casual approach and has not cared to register a crime involving offence of gang rape", the judge observed.
It said the petitioner approached the High Court taking shelter of the aid which he is getting from police.
More From This Section
It said the case diary reveals that apart from treating the matter as one under Section 354 IPC (outraging the modesty of a woman), police has not cared to go further.
Ravi Kiran had moved the high court seeking anticipatory bail after his wife raised 'baseless' charges against him following his move to approach a family court for divorce.
On a complaint from the woman that she had allegedly been tortured for dowry and her husband's senior colleagues had tried to molest her, police here had registered a case against 10 people, including her husband, under Sect 498 of the IPC.
The charges of torture related to dowry issues were against her husband and his close relatives.
The Navy has denied the woman's charges and said her complaint was the result of "a marital discord" and the charges raised by her against superior officers were "unfair.