Dismissing the appeal of convict Mithu Rai against the trial court order, Justice Sunita Gupta relied on the testimony of the girl and observed that such offenders deserve severe punishment.
"The victim was only a five-year-old child when this gruesome and abhorring act of rape was committed by the accused. Such an act leaves a permanent scar on personality of the child, inhibiting growth and development.
Noting that the trial court had awarded a sentence of 10 years -- the minimum sentence prescribed under section 376(2)(f) (rape of a woman under 12 years of age) of the IPC, the court said "there was no discretion vested in the court to impose a lesser sentence which the facts and circumstances of the case even otherwise did not warrant."
"I see absolutely no reason to disbelieve the testimony of the prosecutrix who withstood the test of cross examination," Justice Gupta said as she rejected the objections raised by Rai that he was convicted on the sole evidence of the victim.
Also Read
It also referred to an earlier judgement of the Supreme Court in which it termed rapists as "menace to the civilized society" who "should be mercilessly and inexorably punished in the severest terms."
As per the prosecution, on September 12, 2007, the girl was playing with other children near her North Delhi home, when Rai called her on pretext of giving money, took her to his house, raped her and let her free by giving Rs two.
Rai had denied the allegations alleging that he was falsely implicated in the case.
On October 11, 2010, the trial court had sentenced Rai to 10 years imprisonment after convicting him for offence under section 376(2)(f) (commits rape on a woman when she is under twelve years of age) of the IPC.