The court, however, modified the trial court order dropping its rider that "his sentence should not be remitted till he served 20 years in jail".
Dismissing the appeal filed by Sant Ram alias Sadhu Ram against the trial court's conviction, a bench of justices G S Sistani and G P Mittal said it is established that the appellant, who is father of the prosecutrix and the protector of the daughter, himself betrayed her trust.
"If we do accept that the act committed by the appellant was ghastly, abominable and barbaric, the appellant was not liable to be punished with imprisonment of life with the rider that his case of commutation ought not to be considered unless he serves the actual sentence of 20 years," the bench said.
The bench accepted victim's statement and DNA report which established that Ram was the perpetrator and said, "We do not find any reason to disbelieve the testimony with regard to the sexual intercourse by the father as also the DNA report...."