"From the selection of witnesses to timing to failing to seek a fair and balanced view, everything about hearing fell short, suggesting that the hearing may have been a last ditch effort to influence India's upcoming elections by focusing on the 2002 riots in Gujarat some 12 years after the fact," Congressman Eni Faleomavaega, said.
A ranking member of the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific - which has broad jurisdiction for US foreign policy affecting the region, including India, Faleomavaega in a statement questioned the intent of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission in holding a hearing about the rights and freedoms of religious minorities in India ahead of elections.
"By inviting a panel of witnesses that give voice to only one side of an issue, I believe the Commission drifts from its mission, whether intentionally or not," he said.
Faleomavaega in the past has been instrumental in passage of non-binding Congressional resolutions in favour of Narendra Modi, the BJP's prime ministerial candidate.
"India is a multi-cultural and multi-religious democracy. India, like the United States, has an independent and transparent Judiciary and, after an investigation that has been ongoing for more than a decade, Modi has been cleared by the highest court in the land of any and all allegations that he intentionally failed to protect Muslims during religious violence in Gujarat," he said.