Activists in the former British colony had their hopes for genuine democracy dashed after China announced on Sunday that the city's next leader would be vetted by a pro-Beijing committee.
In a statement late yesterday Britain's Foreign and Commonwealth Office said: "We welcome the confirmation that China's objective is for the election of Hong Kong's Chief Executive through universal suffrage."
It said there was no perfect model, adding it recognised that the "detailed terms" of the decision would disappoint people pushing for a more open nomination process.
"I have one word for that: shameful," veteran democracy campaigner Martin Lee told AFP.
Also Read
"They won't dare say anything that might possibly offend Beijing," Lee said, adding that Britain had every right to question China's decision.
Pro-democracy lawmaker Claudia Mo was equally scathing.
"I'm very disappointed," she told AFP. "No-one is asking Britain to announce... Any punitive measures, just to speak up, speak loud and speak up. They couldn't even do that. It's so cowardly."
Britain handed Hong Kong back to China in 1997 under an agreement that allows civil liberties not seen on the mainland, including free speech and the right to protest.
London's statement contrasted with comments from the United States earlier this week, which took a more robust stance towards Beijing.
Britain's response comes after Chinese authorities on Monday demanded London drop an inquiry into the progress of democratic reforms in Hong Kong, accusing it of "highly inappropriate" interference in its affairs, the BBC reported.
In fresh comments today, China's foreign ministry warned Britain against any further meddling.
Lee, along with Anson Chan, a former number two official for the city, travelled to Britain in July to urge London not to turn a blind eye to "attacks on freedoms that were enshrined in the 1997 handover to China".