A bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra said that the trial judge had granted them bail without following the established parameters of law and the high court had rightly cancelled the relief.
The bench observed that the victim, along with his wife, was "staying in peace away from the acrimonious community" but due to some kind of "misconceived class honour", the incident had taken place.
"They (accused) thought that their perception mattered and as alleged, they put an end to the life spark of the young man. The choice of the daughter was allowed no space. Her identity was crushed and her thinking was crucified by parental dominance which has roots in an unfathomable sense of community honour," the bench noted.
The apex court also said that "perversity of approach by the additional sessions judge, who has enlarged the appellants on bail, is totally unacceptable" and was "reflective of sanctuary of errors".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content