In an affidavit filed by officiating chief secretary P Mitra, the government said it was always its effort to avoid posting of tainted officers in sensitive posts. But "since non-sensitive posts are not there in all cadres, it may at times become unavoidable to assign some officers in posts, which cannot strictly be termed as non-sensitive," he added.
A division bench comprising acting Chief Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir and Justice Kuldip Singh fixed the next hearing on December 6.
Referring to the November 18 orders, Mitra said the additional advocate general's assurance to shift 43 officers of doubtful integrity from sensitive to non-sensitive posts were made "inadvertently" and "no such assurance was made in the affidavit filed by him on November 16".
"Only details of competent authorities, consulted while posting such officers on sensitive posts, were given in the affidavit," he said.
Expressing displeasure over the department secretaries not furnishing information to the chief secretary on whether the posting of tainted officers to sensitive posts was with the concurrence and approval of the highest authority, the bench had directed the secretaries to furnish the information within a day.