Researchers from Utrecht University in the Netherlands conducted three experiments on a group of students to test whether hunger led to advantageous strategic decision-making.
In all experiments, the students were split up into two groups - fasting and non-fasting.
The fasting participants ate nothing for approximately 10 hours before taking a test, while the non-fasting group was treated to a generous breakfast, where they were free to eat and drink as much as they wanted.
The fasting group performed better than the non-fasting group, managing to understand the pattern of long-term rewards over short-term gains, 'sciencealert.Com.Au' reported.
Also Read
"These results show that people who were hungry because of having fasted overnight performed better on a complex decision task than sated people and thus provides a first piece of evidence that the hot state of hunger improves, rather than compromises, advantageous decision making," researchers said.
In the third experiment, the participants were presented with a set of questions that required them to choose between being given a small amount of money at that moment or a larger amount of money in the future.
The study was published in the journal PLOS One.