The department, using the 2012 law that gives it power to impose retrospective tax, had last year made a demand of Rs 29,047 crore on Cairn Energy for alleged capital gains on a 10-year old internal reorganisation of its India unit.
However, it barred Cairn Energy from selling its residual 9.8 per cent stake in Cairn India, its erstwhile subsidiary which it had in 2011 sold to mining billionaire Anil Agarwal's Vedanta Group, during the pendency of the tax dispute. It later also froze payment of dividend by Cairn India to be paid to Cairn Energy.
"Confirmation received via the international arbitration that dividends of USD 31 million due from Cairn India Ltd (CIL) are no longer restricted," Cairn Energy said in its 2016 earnings statement.
The company said it has asked CIL to immediately release the sum.
More From This Section
"Cairn UK Holdings Ltd (CUHL), a direct subsidiary of Cairn Energy PLC, is in receipt of an assessment order from the Indian income tax department relating to the intra-group restructuring undertaken in 2006 prior to the IPO of CIL in India, which cites a retrospective amendment to Indian tax law introduced in 2012," the statement said.
The assessment order levies a tax of Rs 10,247 crore plus interest backdated to 2007, totalling Rs 18,800 crore.
"The total assets of CUHL have a value at the balancesheet date of USD 749.3 million (comprising principally the group's 9.8 per cent shareholding in CIL) and any recovery by the Indian authorities would be limited to such assets," it said.
The company said it is pursuing its rights under Indian law to appeal the assessment, both in respect of the basis of taxation and the quantum assessed.
Based on detailed legal advice, Cairn said it is confident
that it will be successful in such arbitration.
The seat of arbitration has been agreed as The Hague in the Netherlands and Cairn filed its statement of claim in June 2016 which clearly demonstrates that applying the retrospective amendment to Cairn and seizing USD 1 billion worth of CIL shares was in breach of the UK-India Investment Treaty obligations of fair and equitable treatment and its protections against expropriation.
"Cairn has asked the arbitration panel either to order India to withdraw its unlawful tax demand and compensate Cairn for the harm suffered by the seizure of the CIL shares, being not less than USD 1.1 billion (plus costs); or, if the tax demand remains in place, compensate Cairn for the quantum of the tax assessment and the harm suffered by the seizure of the CIL shares, being together not less than USD 5.6 billion (plus costs)," the statement added.