"Airlines are aligned with governments in wanting to get their passengers to their destinations on time. But sometimes that is just not possible. Governments should set some simple guarantees on what passengers should expect in such situations. But un-harmonised and extra-territorial regulations can cause utter confusion for international travelers," IATA chief Tony Tyler said here.
"Being stuck in Europe on a disrupted trip from the United States to Israel is bad enough for a passenger. Regulation shouldn't worsen the situation by presenting them with a bewildering array of three conflicting passenger rights regimes," he said at IATA annual conference which unanimously endorsed a set of core principles for governments to consider when adopting consumer protection rules.
Observing that the industry was providing a fresh solution which should be considered by governments, he said the core principles on consumer protection, adopted at the meet, would help governments harmonise their various regimes.
The core principles, included in the resolution, addressed a variety of "uncoordinated and extra-territorial passenger rights legislation and regulation that is the cause of confusion among passengers."
These should also reflect the impact of extraordinary circumstances when determining compensation in case of flight disruptions.